Evaluation
Criteria | Excellent (4 pts) | Good (3 pts) | Fair (2 pts) | Needs Improvement (1 pt) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Understanding Cyberbullying | Accurately defines cyberbullying and identifies different forms with clear descriptions. | Provides a definition and identifies some forms of cyberbullying. | Definition is unclear or missing. Limited understanding of forms. | Definition and understanding of forms are weak or missing. |
Case Study Analysis | Demonstrates a clear understanding of the impact of cyberbullying on the victim. | Analyzes the impact to some extent. | Analysis is limited or unclear. | Limited or no analysis provided. |
Consequences of Cyberbullying | Provides insightful research on consequences for both victim and bully, using data and statistics. | Research is present but could be more detailed or supported by data. | Limited research on consequences. | Research is missing or inaccurate. |
Bystander Effect | Demonstrates a strong understanding of the bystander effect and how to intervene. | Explains the bystander effect and some ways to intervene. | Understanding of the bystander effect and intervention is limited. | The concept of the bystander effect and intervention is not explained. |
Prevention Strategies | Identifies and explains 3 effective strategies for preventing cyberbullying. | Identifies some strategies for prevention. | Strategies are limited or unclear. | Strategies are missing or ineffective. |
Reporting Resources | Accurately identifies reporting guidelines for a chosen social media platform. | Provides some information on reporting resources. | Information on reporting resources is limited or inaccurate. | Reporting resources are missing. |
Digital PSA | Creative and effective PSA promoting positive online behavior and addressing cyberbullying. Clearly uses chosen technology tool. | PSA is informative and addresses cyberbullying, utilizing the chosen technology tool somewhat effectively. | PSA is somewhat informative. | PSA lacks effectiveness or is missing. |